The US Attorney’s indictment of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz on a charge of conspiracy to commit forced labor identifies the business the defendants ran—OneTaste—through which they allegedly conspired to force people to labor. It reveals the cities where they conspired, allegedly.
The prosecution characterized the intended victims of their alleged conspiracy as “OneTaste members.”
Had Daedone and Cherwitz followed through on their conspiracy to force labor, the prosecutors allege they would have forced so-called OneTaste “members” – people who worked for the company, as well as students and clients – to do labor for them out of fear of harm or by force.
The indictment mentions that OneTaste was a business that charged money for classes and other services, so they might benefit if their alleged conspiracy to force anyone to labor had worked.
The indictment does not state, nor does it need to state, what kind of labor Daedone and Cherwitz conspired to make the “members” do, with good reason: The US Attorney does not allege that Daedone and Cherwitz forced anyone into labor.
OneTaste’s Enchanting Conspiracy
The indictment also clarifies when Daedone and Cherwitz conspired to force people to labor: From 2006 to 2018. During these twelve years, the prosecutors allege Daedone and Cherwitz hatched the “scheme.”
Notably, these two women are a little unique among conspiring criminals. In the 12 years they allegedly conspired to force people to labor, they never pulled it off.
IQ question:
Two women conspired to force 112 employees, 232 students, six investors, 236 members, and seven random drunkards to labor.
How many people did the women force to do labor?
A: Based on the question: None. The women only conspired to force people to labor.
Want the proof?
The US Attorney did not charge Daedone and Cherwitz with forced labor. He only charged them with conspiracy to commit forced labor.
Let me give you another example to help you understand why the prosecutors are correct: The judge should not have dismissed the indictment against Daedone and Cherwitz just because the prosecutors failed to name a victim: No who, what, where, or how anyone was hurt.
The prosecutors alleged why. No one needed to be hurt.
Women Charged with Concocting Labor Plot
Here’s the example:
Two women conspired to cast spells on people to force them to work under their spell. The two women gathered at midnight, and with kindlings of mugwort, pine needles, and lavender twigs, they set fire to the ash and willow and placed a large cauldron above it.
Among the items in discovery (along with the FBI notes of their significance in parenthesis):
Eye of Newt – (for seeing who will labor)
Toe of Frog – (to hop swiftly into labor)
Adder’s Fork – (to sow deception among the workers)
Lizard’s Leg – (to make the workers agile and quick)
Scale of Dragon – (to make them invulnerable to harm, so they can work harder)
Witch’s Mummified Finger – (for casting powerful curses)
Mandrake Root – (screams when uprooted and induces being gaslit)
Moonbeam Collected Dew – (to enhance magical abilities)
Goblin’s Earwax – (to repel unwanted attention from the FBI)
Fairy Dust – (for lightness and ethereal movement, so the FBI wouldn’t catch on that these happy workers all believed they were working of their own free will when they were really being forced to labor by the potent spell)
The prosecutors charged them with conspiracy to commit witchcraft. After all, they had collected these items, some of them are hard to find, as most of you witches know.
However, the prosecutors did not charge the two women with the substantive crime of witchery, because, though they agreed to cast spells, none of them ever worked.
No one did any labor they did not agree to do.
Defendant Rachel Cherwitz
No one did anyone do any labor they did not agree to do.
At the trial, the jury, which was made up, I fear, of some closet witches, laughed when the prosecutor tried to show the conspiracy by telling the jury about the types of spells and the exact language they used.
Forced Labor Spell
Incantation: “Chains of magic bind them evermore, close their brains so they can think no more. By the power of slavery’s might, make the spell and begin their forced labor plight!”
Transformation Spell – To transform adult men and women into ninnies who cannot think for themselves:
Incantation: “Mutatio Formae, shapeshift anew, from once smart and independent to blindly obedient and stupid too!”
Summoning Spell – To call forth forced laborers:
Incantation: “Vocatio Entitas, work when I call, breach the forced labor law, obey my thrall and tell the FBI to go pound a wall!”
The Coven outside the Courthouse
From OneTaste to No Taste: Feds Forced Labor Fiasco
In the present case, the US Attorney argues that the indictment of Daedone and Cherwitz clearly states the object of the conspiracy.
Why else would anyone have an eye of newt? teach classes on the topics that OneTaste taught?
At the hearing last week, where Judge Gujarati denied the dismissal of the indictment, she set a firm date for trial: January 13th, 2025.
The next conference is on November 15th, 2024.
The bottom line: There was no dismissal of the indictment despite Daedone and Cherwitz contending the indictment does not identify any victims.
But as the US Attorney wrote, “Here, the Indictment clearly identifies the crime which Cherwitz and Daedone conspired to commit.”
And in doing so, he revealed his entire case:
The US Attorney wrote, “[T]he defendants overlook that the instant case charges a conspiracy and not a substantive offense. The defendants could be proven guilty if they never forced any victim to do anything—so long as the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that they agreed to do so….
“[In a] forced labor charge … the specific identity of the victim is of …significance….[I]n a conspiracy case… the proof need not establish that anyone was, in fact, victimized.”
What does it mean?
What does it mean? That Daedone and Cherwitz are accused of a victimless crime.
How will the prosecutors keep the jury from laughing them out of court?
Simple. The prosecutors will try to dirty up the defendants. Talk about sex as if it were very dirty and show what the company teaches – that women can explore their sexuality in ways that are perfectly legal – is dirty and is disapproved of by many.
Lacking a victim and presenting an implausible story of 12 years of scheming to get anyone to do labor and failing, the prosecutors will prove instead that Daedone and Cherwitz are witches. If they get an imbecile jury, they might win.
Have your broomsticks and griffin claws ready. We are about to see a 21st-century witch trial, a case that is really a case against wrong thinking.
And let us commend the US attorney for the Eastern District of NY for making Brooklyn safe from witches and ladies who think they have the right to teach what they want even if there are no victims.
