General

Kozak gets ‘pain is profit’ fortune, but his cookie may be crumbling

02/04/2018·

Frank Parlato

“That which is painful to the body may be profitable to the soul.”?

It seems Ken Kozak got this Vanguardian-style message in a fortune cookie.

This is in a nutshell how everyone was groomed for abuse.

Ken Kozak is the purveyor of this philosophy, as he informs those who follow him that “My fortune cookie is down with #SOP #society of protectors.

Ken’s cookie may be about to crumble.

13230205_10153801116323515_4816726744642388753_n

Ken likes to stick his neck out for Raniere. “That which is painful to the body may be profitable to the soul!” Going to prison for Vanguard will qualify for painful to the body. But will it be profitable for Ken’s soul?

Ken, as he knows, was involved in a fake marriage as part of the massive immigration fraud Keith Raniere devised. The evidence is available to law enforcement.

Ken and his bride perjured themselves on her green card application.

Kozak, a longtime follower of Raniere, and member of the Society of Protectors, is a US citizen. He married Sahajo Haertel, a German national, and she acquired a green card.

She also reportedly acquired a brand near her vagina. She is reputedly a DOS slave and has Raniere’s initials branded on her pubic region.

Ken and Sahajo stopped living together before the required time for the couple to cohabit. Of course, they forgot to tell this to US Immigration officials, but proof is available.

Sahajo is a fusion tribal belly dancer. Here she performs for Keith Raniere and his Espians during the 12-day birthday celebration of Keith Raniere called Vanguard Week. Sahajo got her green card and promptly divorced Ken.

Reliable sources said Sahajo visited Vanguard, before, during and after her marriage for private mentoring and that she has very good bedside manners.

Vanguard stands and applauds the talent who perform for him during the 12-day celebration of his nativity.

Comments (4)

Add Your Comment

Flowers02/04/2018

The saying “that which is painful may be profitable to the soul” , is actually a common theme in spiritual teachings. It means that there can be some purpose to going thru difficult situations…that how we react to the inevitable hardships in life, which we are all faced with, is how we learn. If we are faced with something such really tough, as a serious illness, and we become angry and bitter, then our soul hasn't learned anything from the experience. Basically we have the choice to react with anger and bitterness, or with acceptance, and therefore learn something from the painful experience. It seems to me that the only NXIVM members who have learned anything from their experiences, are the former members who finally realized that their beloved Vanguard was actually a crazy, evil monster, and got as far away from him as possible. The members who didn't figure that out, will be suffering much more in the near future, than those who learned the painful lesson already. They choice to make the right decision was always there, some just chose to take the wrong path.

Onewomanarmy02/04/2018

So true about the written wisdom, it pains me immensely this covering over of unscrupulous behaviour with axiomatic truths, but they also prove by this continual usurpation of other’s rigorous intellectual labour, that they are themselves intellectually and morally bankrupt – By abiding with and remaining obedient to the values of mr. Keith Raniere, they endorse contempt for knowledge as a human enterprise, preferring to retweet copious and random aspects of it, like confetti or ticker-tape (from sites dedicated to the curation of such wisdom for our FREE delectation and delight) So that it might reflect well on them, and deflect criticism or at least confuse momentarily, perception being everything to a con artist whose willful exploitation of the effects of incoherence on the human brain are probably his very own tribute to process ontology and quantum mechanics.

SOS02/04/2018

Morality presupposes the notions of right and wrong, which presupposes a standard from which to judge, which presupposes the intellect from which to judge courses of actions labelled as right and wrong, as well as the idea of volition, or the free will to choose among them. This is enough to imply the absurdity of Relativism as a moral philosophy. Judging from a standard presupposes the intelligibility of it, which implies understanding the meaning of it and something within it, which implies the notion of a proper place of it within a coherent system. In the metaphysical framework I adhere to which deals with Reality as such as a such a system, I believe in a God that is the most merciful and the most just. In other words, these are two all pervading principles of Reality that flow from the Nature of things. One cannot have mercy without a tempered justice. An absolute mercy without justice is incoherent. It implies that those who commit good/right and evil/wrong are equivalent, and hence those terms become meaningless. Hence the idea of a “limited” evil. Moral adversity is one such thing, and when it falls upon an individual out of his own doing, it only exists to rectify the improper place of something within the system. The latter can’t remain a system as such if it constantly changes. Moral evil can be unintentional and hence, an error or fault, or intentional, and hence, malicious or malevolent. There are other evils which are like disease and natural disasters that happen to people which aren't moral per se, but “natural”. The primary determining factor of a course of action should be its rightness or truth to the system, no matter the consequences, such as loss of material benefit. In the metaphysical framework I believe in, there are two different types of rights. The rights due to God by an individual, and the rights of individuals among other individuals. The violation of rights is a wrong. The latter entails rectification, which includes righting the wrong via mending or punishment, or forgiveness of the wrong, which comes out of grace. Violation of such rights due to Him are solely up to Him to forgive, and His Grace Is the greatest. The same applies to the violation of rights of an individual by another individual. The violation of the rights of an individual by another is still a violation of the rights of God, however, in this case, right of rectification/forgiveness is granted to the wronged individual. The one who wrongs another is considered in debt proportional to the weight of the violation and it is up to them only to accept the rectification, to forgive, or not. Individuals don't tend to be as forgiving as God. Justice as a principle balances itself either here and now and/or in the next life. This in other philosophies is known as Karma.

Flowers02/05/2018

Frank….it seems quiet on here. …the calm before the storm perhaps? If my harassers really are connected to this NXIVM bullshit (according to tips I've recieved they are. ..) I can report that my harassers seem to be panicking right now, and in their panic they are screwing themselves. Lol. They just messaged me with 2 fake social media profiles made in the names of my original Facebook haraassers. It's interesting because I never even knew the last names of these people (but I saved their old profile pics so I can prove it's the same people). If any concrete link can be found to NXIVM, (besides the one I already have connecting them to the Bronfmans lawfirm) I think they will be totally fucked now. Let's hope they keep panicking!