Editor’s Note: Frank Report makes its standing objection to all family court proceedings: As long as there is no jury in family court, the abuse will continue on the simple principle that power corrupts and that juries were designed solely as a check and balance to the power of the judge and the power of the king. In family court, the judge is the king.
A jury trial is trial by the people, as opposed to trial by government.
Now some excerpted recent correspondence by CT activist Peter Szymonik.
By Peter Szymonik
Constitutional and Civil Rights Activist
Autism Advocate
It remains a fact that not a single “family” court judge in Connecticut was ever held accountable for flagrant violations of rights and laws in our broken and corrupt “family” courts, and denied reappointment by the attorney-packed Judiciary Committee.
Judge Klatt barely made it through the legislature eight years ago.
Barry Amarta, “GAL in Chief in Hartford”, was made a judge by only 14 votes. If attorneys on the Judiciary Committee did not vote in his favor, he would not be a judge today.
Judge Jane Emons: Eleven Lawsuits and a Legacy of Abuse
Vote no to Judge Emons billboard
Former judge Jane B. Emons
Jane Emons, a notorious “family” court judge who had eleven (11) federal lawsuits filed against her, was known for standing up on the bench and SCREAMING at lawyers and parents who had the misfortune of being before her. She sailed out of the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 30-3.
Judge Bozzuto’s Stunning Admission: ‘Due Process Is Not Important’
Ct Judge Elizabeth Buzzuto
Our Chief Court Administrator, Judge Bozzuto, is on the record as stating her belief that “due process is not important” when it comes to fleecing parents to line the pockets of millionaire attorneys.
She is also on the record as testifying that “her family courts” are not equipped to handle cases involving Domestic Violence because “her family courts” do not have access to the same resources DCF does. (2019 – Judiciary Committee testimony.)
So why then, pray tell, are “her family courts” continuing to (mis)handle cases involving criminal claims of DV?
Coercive Control or Government Overreach?
I recently received a broadcast email from Connecticut Rep. Nicole Klarides-Ditria, voicing her support for a new law that will permit unwarranted government intrusion into personal lives and unjustified expansion of the definition of “Domestic Violence” (DV).
Rep. Klarides-Ditria proudly touted her support for the new bill:
“I supported this bill, which seeks to end control tactics used by abusers to keep victims of domestic violence tied to them. I hope this legislation will help victims gain financial security for their long-term safety by providing them with critical consumer protections.”
This law has absolutely nothing to do with “protecting victims of DV” or “providing consumer protections.”
This law allows more unwarranted government intrusion into people’s personal lives, their children’s lives, their families, and curtails their individual liberties and personal freedoms.
It represents further groundwork for state government, DCF, and “family” courts to invade their liberties and freedoms by criminalizing acts and choices that are not criminal.
Why would the state do this?
Domestic Violence Laws or Financial Manipulation?
Expand the definition of DV to where it does not belong, criminalize parenting, criminalize personal choices, and that means more federal $$$ flowing to the state.
Let’s discuss the fallacy and state manipulation of “coercive control” and “coercive financial abuse.”
Here is the Divorce Industry and State Playbook:
File a false or manufactured claim of “abuse” against a targeted parent or former partner claiming “coercive control.”
Immediately get access to DV resources. Paid for by TAXPAYERS and the STATE, with FEDERAL FUNDING.
Destroy the life of the targeted parent using baseless DCF substantiations and perpetuating false claims in our broken and corrupt “family” courts.
Remember!! There are no penalties for perjury or knowingly making false claims, even under oath, with DCF or in our “family” courts.
Judicial Terrorism in Family Courts: A New Form of Coercive Control?
When “family” court judges routinely seize ALL a parent’s assets, seize their children, destroy their ability to hold employment, and make them homeless, then JAIL THEM for being unable to pay “child support” because of what the state did…. Isn’t that also COERCIVE CONTROL and FINANCIAL TERRORISM?
Perhaps our legislators should ask prosecutors to issue arrest warrants against “family” court judges who promote and reward abuse, promote DV, and engage in coercive control against the parents they knowingly destroy in their courtrooms.
Like Judges Corinne Klatt,
Margaret Murphy, Erika Tindill, Jane Grossman and Thomas O’Neil.
Judge Jane Grossman
Judge Thomas O’Neill
Judge Erika Tindill does her best to provide for the best interest of the lawyers in family court.
